Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Strong Kirchheimer vs Sem Verbeek Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Kirchheimer vs Verbeek analysis and find out who is favored!
Strong Kirchheimer vs Sem Verbeek Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Kirchheimer 1 - 0 Verbeek
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Kirchheimer has won 51.29% of points on their second serve, while Verbeek has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Kirchheimer, in recent form, has won 47.72% of their opponent's second serve points, while Verbeek has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 30.47% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Kirchheimer has saved 60.93% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Verbeek has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Kirchheimer has won 51.61% of matches played (W/L 32/ 30), with Verbeek winning 0% (W/L 0/ 0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Kirchheimer has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 57% (W/L 53/ 40), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 56% (W/L 152/ 118). Verbeek has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 59% (W/L 76/ 53), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 43% (W/L 6/ 8).
- Player level: In the last year, Kirchheimer has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 47.62% of matches (W/L 20/ 22), where as Verbeek has played most of their matches on the , winning 0% of matches (W/L / ). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Verbeek being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Kirchheimer winning 2 and Verbeek winning 1. The last match between Kirchheimer and Verbeek was at the USA F15 (Winston-Salem), 19-06-2018, First, Hard with Strong Kirchheimer getting the victory 6-3 4-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Kirchheimer and Verbeek have played a deciding set 1 times, with Kirchheimer winning 1 times and Verbeek 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Kirchheimer winning 0, and Verbeek 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Kirchheimer has played against opponents with an average rank of 263.73 while Verbeek has played against players with an average rank of .
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Kirchheimer has won 47% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Verbeek has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Kirchheimer has converted 40% of breakpoint opportunities, and Verbeek has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
482
Rank
375
High
29
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
1
Hard0
0
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
884
Rank
531
High
30
Age
L
Plays
L
L
L
W
W
L
W
W
W
L
Form
L
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
56% (278-216)
Career Total W/L
57% (104-78)
46% (11-13)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$3,990
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Strong Kirchheimer vs Sem Verbeek For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Kirchheimer VS Verbeek
Sportsbook
Offer
Kirchheimer VS Verbeek H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Sem Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 16 | 12 |
| Aces (Total) | 2 | 7 |
| DFs (Total) | 6 | 10 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:0 | 2:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 67% (60/90) | 55% (46/84) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 60% (36/60) | 63% (29/46) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 63% (19/30) | 50% (19/38) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 63% (5/8) | 30% (3/10) |
| Return Points W% | 43% (36/84) | 39% (35/90) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Kirchheimer VS Verbeek H2h Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-3 4-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Sem Verbeek
67%
(
60 of
90)
1st Serve %
55%
(
46 of
84)
2
Aces
7
6
Double Faults
10
60%
(
36 of
60)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
29 of
46)
63%
(
19 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
19 of
38)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
30%
(
3 of
10)
39%
(
35 of
90)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
36 of
84)
91
Total Points Won
83
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Strong Kirchheimer | Sem Verbeek |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 46% (11/13) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 50% (28/28) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 49% (253/261) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 33% (2/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0.41 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 102 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0.25 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 63 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1:46:39 | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 341.08 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 61% (988/1610) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 70% (689/988) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 51% (319/622) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 40% (58/145) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 37% (606/1628) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 44% (7/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 50% (4/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 46% (11/24) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 50% (3/6) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 25% (2/8) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 69% (13/9) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 31% (13/4) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 18% (11/2) | 0% (0/0) |
Strong Kirchheimer Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SF |
Stats
Oliver Tarvet
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
52%
(
22 of
42)
1st Serve %
58%
(
28 of
48)
6
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
2
82%
(
18 of
22)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
17 of
28)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
6 of
20)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
12 of
42)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
25 of
48)
55
Total Points Won
35
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Collin Altamirano
65%
(
31 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
32 of
57)
4
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
5
77%
(
24 of
31)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
19 of
32)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
11 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
30 of
57)
67
Total Points Won
38
|
6-0 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Colton Smith
56%
(
44 of
78)
1st Serve %
71%
(
58 of
82)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
29 of
44)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
31 of
58)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
41%
(
32 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
41 of
82)
87
Total Points Won
73
|
7-6(3) 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Bryce Nakashima
60%
(
24 of
40)
1st Serve %
58%
(
31 of
53)
0
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
71%
(
17 of
24)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
16 of
31)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
28%
(
11 of
40)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Mitchell Krueger
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
60%
(
31 of
52)
1st Serve %
51%
(
28 of
55)
4
Aces
4
0
Double Faults
2
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
18 of
28)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
12 of
27)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
14 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
25 of
55)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Leo Borg
57%
(
28 of
49)
1st Serve %
69%
(
50 of
72)
4
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
79%
(
22 of
28)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
28 of
50)
62%
(
13 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
10 of
22)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
69
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Strong Kirchheimer
Player
Andres Urrea
56%
(
22 of
39)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
6
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
19 of
22)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
20 of
30)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
15%
(
6 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
23 of
51)
56
Total Points Won
34
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
59%
(
38 of
64)
1st Serve %
64%
(
44 of
69)
4
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
84%
(
32 of
38)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
32 of
44)
65%
(
17 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
33%
(
2 of
6)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
23%
(
15 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
24 of
69)
73
Total Points Won
60
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Elijah Poritzky
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
61%
(
60 of
98)
1st Serve %
72%
(
61 of
85)
2
Aces
11
8
Double Faults
5
68%
(
41 of
60)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
39 of
61)
45%
(
17 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
33%
(
4 of
12)
41%
(
40 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
38 of
85)
96
Total Points Won
87
|
6-4 3-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Patrick Maloney
Player
Strong Kirchheimer
76%
(
39 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
29 of
48)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
79%
(
31 of
39)
1st Serve Won
79%
(
23 of
29)
75%
(
9 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
8 of
19)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
22%
(
11 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
17 of
48)
57
Total Points Won
42
|
6-1 7-5 | H2H | ||
view more
Sem Verbeek Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniil Glinka
Player
Sem Verbeek
68%
(
36 of
53)
1st Serve %
56%
(
38 of
68)
10
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
22 of
38)
71%
(
12 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
13 of
30)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
30%
(
16 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
70
Total Points Won
51
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Bu Yunchaokete
Player
Sem Verbeek
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
2
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
25 of
47)
73%
(
16 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
15 of
28)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
28%
(
16 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
77
Total Points Won
56
|
6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Ivan Gakhov
Player
Sem Verbeek
61%
(
43 of
71)
1st Serve %
70%
(
65 of
93)
7
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
35 of
43)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
46 of
65)
75%
(
21 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
1 of
2)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
21%
(
15 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
35%
(
33 of
93)
89
Total Points Won
75
|
7-6(3) 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Martin Krumich
Player
Sem Verbeek
60%
(
30 of
50)
1st Serve %
65%
(
44 of
68)
3
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
70%
(
21 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
25 of
44)
60%
(
12 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
9 of
24)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
34 of
68)
67
Total Points Won
51
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Evan Furness
Player
Sem Verbeek
58%
(
25 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
33 of
55)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
83%
(
15 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
27%
(
6 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Georgii Kravchenko
58%
(
35 of
60)
1st Serve %
53%
(
33 of
62)
3
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
3
66%
(
23 of
35)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
17 of
33)
56%
(
14 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
38%
(
23 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
62)
69
Total Points Won
53
|
6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Gastao Elias
Player
Sem Verbeek
53%
(
50 of
94)
1st Serve %
63%
(
67 of
107)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
4
80%
(
40 of
50)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
43 of
67)
55%
(
24 of
44)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
19 of
40)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
32%
(
30 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
45 of
107)
109
Total Points Won
92
|
6-7(7) 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Francisco Cabral
59%
(
42 of
71)
1st Serve %
55%
(
35 of
64)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
0
64%
(
27 of
42)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
22 of
35)
62%
(
18 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
15 of
29)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
27 of
64)
72
Total Points Won
63
|
7-6(4) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Sem Verbeek
Player
Mukund Sasikumar
52%
(
52 of
100)
1st Serve %
45%
(
43 of
95)
7
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
73%
(
38 of
52)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
26 of
43)
50%
(
24 of
48)
2nd Serve Won
62%
(
32 of
52)
31%
(
4 of
13)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
38%
(
38 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
37 of
95)
99
Total Points Won
96
|
3-6 6-3 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
David Poljak
Player
Sem Verbeek
54%
(
26 of
48)
1st Serve %
63%
(
36 of
57)
3
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
3
81%
(
21 of
26)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
22 of
36)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
9 of
21)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
57)
60
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Kirchheimer Vs Verbeek Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Kirchheimer are available here and Verbeek photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
